Picture a CEO in Riyadh who tells the board there are three priorities for the year. By March the diary says something else: procurement decisions reviewed personally, hiring interviews two levels down, and none of the three priorities touched. Nothing has gone wrong, exactly. The work in front of them has simply crowded out the work only they can do.
That is the gap business coaching tends to close. Not knowledge, and rarely strategy. What changes is how a leader spends their judgment.
Most CEOs reading this do not need a course on leadership. They need somewhere to think out loud about a decision they have been circling for six weeks, a deputy who is not stepping up, or a board relationship that has quietly turned cautious. Those things do not surface in a management meeting, and they rarely improve on their own.
Business coaching is a structured, confidential working relationship between a trained coach and a leader, usually one to one, over a set period.
The coach does not hand over answers. They ask the questions that make a situation clearer, surface the assumptions underneath it, test the options, and hold the leader to what they said they would do. The material is whatever the CEO brings that week.
This matters because the word gets used loosely. A consultant diagnoses your problem and recommends a solution. A mentor tells you what worked for them. A trainer teaches a syllabus to a group. A therapist works on clinical issues. Coaching does none of those. It works on how this particular leader operates, in their specific situation, now.
For CEOs, the distinction has a practical edge: a consultant leaves with the insight, while a coaching engagement leaves the capability with the leader.
CEOs rarely suffer from a shortage of decisions. They suffer from a shortage of space in which to make the three or four that actually matter.
A coaching conversation forces a different question than the operational one. Not "what should we do about this supplier" but "why is this on your desk at all." Leaders usually know the answer. Saying it to someone outside the organization is what makes it actionable.
In practice, CEOs use the space to work through what to prioritize when every initiative is labeled urgent, which risks they are underweighting because the news has been good, where their own preference is driving a decision they have framed as analysis, and which call they keep deferring because it involves a person rather than a number.
That last one stalls more strategy than most market conditions do.
Most CEOs believe they communicate clearly. Ask their direct reports and you will often find at least one thing people are not sure the CEO actually meant.
That gap widens with seniority. People filter what they say upward, and a CEO can spend years receiving a slightly edited version of reality. Coaching is one of the few settings where a leader gets an honest read on how their style lands: the pause that reads as disapproval, the question that sounds like a decision already made, the praise so rare it unsettles people when it arrives.
Work here is usually concrete. How to disagree with a board member without it becoming a position. How to say no to a well-liked executive's proposal. How to deliver a restructuring message in a way that does not leave the best people updating their CVs.
In Saudi organizations with multinational leadership teams, this gets another layer. What counts as a clear instruction, acceptable pushback, or a polite no varies by background, and senior leaders are often working across several of those norms in a single meeting.

The clearest sign that coaching is working is usually not visible in the CEO at all. It shows up in the layer below.
Organizations built entirely around one person's judgment have a ceiling, and in Saudi Arabia that ceiling arrives faster than it used to. Family groups are professionalizing governance ahead of listings. Newly formed entities are scaling from nothing. Giga-projects and new regional headquarters are creating senior roles faster than internal pipelines fill them. In every case the CEO's capacity becomes the constraint unless the leadership team grows into real ownership.
Coaching helps with the part of that which is behavioral rather than structural: delegating work you could do faster yourself, letting a capable deputy make a decision differently than you would, naming an underperforming senior hire early instead of absorbing the gap personally, and developing successors rather than dependents.
There is a commercial argument here too. The General Authority for Statistics put the overall unemployment rate at 3.5% in the fourth quarter of 2025, which tells you what senior hiring currently costs. When buying experienced leadership is expensive and slow, building the capability of the people already in the building becomes the cheaper route, and the CEO's own habits decide whether that happens.
Every Saudi organization of scale is currently changing something: operating model, technology, ownership structure, workforce composition. Vision 2030 has accelerated all of it.
Announcing change is usually the easier half, and sustaining it the harder one. The announcement is a single event with a prepared script. Sustaining it means answering the same anxious question for the ninth time without irritation, holding the line when early results disappoint, and noticing which senior leader has quietly stopped advocating for the change in their own team.
Coaching gives a leader somewhere to process that without performing confidence. It is difficult to steady an organization while privately unsteady, and there are usually very few people a CEO can say that to.
The engagement backdrop is worth knowing. Gallup's State of the Global Workplace 2026 report puts employee engagement in Saudi Arabia at 26% (a three-year average ending 2025), above the global average of 20% and well ahead of the Middle East and North Africa average of 14%. The number that matters for a CEO leading change is the other one: 62% of employees are not engaged. That majority is who a transformation has to move.
Less than providers suggest, but the emphasis differs.
| Business coaching | Executive coaching |
| Starts from a business problem: growth, performance, an organizational decision | Starts from the leader: how they operate, decide, and affect others |
| Often involves founders, owners and managing directors | Usually senior executives and C-suite |
| Tends to run alongside a commercial objective | Tends to run alongside a role transition or a step up in scope |
| Success looks like a business issue resolved | Success looks like changed leadership behavior |
For a CEO the two converge quickly, because the business problem usually has a leadership behavior sitting underneath it. What matters more than the label is the coach's credential, their experience at your level, and whether the chemistry works. Ask about all three before you ask which category a provider puts themselves in.
No credible coach will guarantee a revenue number, and any provider who does is selling something else.
What a CEO can reasonably expect over two or three quarters: decisions that were stuck getting made, a leadership team taking more ownership, difficult conversations happening earlier, and a clearer sense of which problems genuinely require the CEO. Those are observable, and they are the honest basis for deciding whether to continue.
Engagements typically run six to twelve sessions over six to twelve months, with shorter blocks of four to six sessions where a specific transition is the focus. Sessions are confidential. Where the organization sponsors the coaching, it receives participation and progress against agreed goals, not the content of the conversations.

CoachBase gives organizations access to a global network of more than 1,900 coaches across 65 countries, working in over 50 languages, each accredited by the ICF, EMCC or AC. For a Saudi organization that usually means a credible choice of coaches in both Arabic and English, matched to the sector and seniority rather than to whoever is free.
The organizational offering runs from 1:1 CXO coaching, leadership team coaching and succession planning through to coaching for managers further down the organization, team and group coaching, and 360 degree feedback alongside behavioral psychometrics for leaders who want a sharper picture before they start.
Credentials are worth checking rather than assuming. Working with an ICF-certified coach means a defined competency framework, assessed coaching practice and a published ethics process sit behind the engagement. The 2025 ICF Global Coaching Study, conducted by PwC across 10,035 responses from 127 countries, counted 122,974 coach practitioners worldwide, so credentialed supply exists globally. The question for any buyer is whether a given provider has secured it.
Is coaching an admission that a CEO is struggling? No, and that framing stops a lot of good leaders from using it. Coaching is most effective with capable people in demanding roles, which is why it is standard at senior levels in most mature markets.
How is this different from having a trusted advisor on the board? A board member has a stake in the outcome and a governance role. A coach has neither, which is precisely what makes certain conversations possible.
How often should a CEO meet their coach? Usually every two to four weeks. Closer together during a transition or a live organizational change, further apart once the work moves into applying things rather than deciding them.
Should coaching be in Arabic or English? Whichever the leader thinks in. Reflective work goes deeper in a first language, and a platform with real depth in both makes that an actual choice rather than a stated one.
What does the organization see? Participation and progress against the goals agreed at the start. Not session content. Agree that boundary in writing before the engagement begins.
If you are a CEO who can name the decision you have been avoiding, you already know what the first session would be about. If you are an HR or board sponsor, the useful question is narrower: which of our senior leaders are carrying weight they have never been supported to carry?
To talk through what business coaching would look like for your leadership team, book a discovery call with CoachBase.